Inside Quantum Technology - Get The Latest Quantum News & Events Here

When an industry is “pulling” a technology, it means the market demand and specific consumer needs are driving the development and adoption of that innovation.

This concept is part of the “Market Pull” vs. “Technology Push” framework in economics and business strategy.

Key Characteristics of a “Pull” Scenario

• Problem-First Approach: The industry faces a concrete bottleneck, high cost, or regulatory pressure, and looks for a technological solution to fix it.
• Immediate Adoption: Because the industry is actively seeking the solution, the technology is usually adopted very quickly once it becomes viable.
• Customer-Centric R&D: Companies focus their research budgets strictly on what customers are explicitly asking for, rather than exploring abstract scientific discoveries.

How “Pull” is Changing the Quantum Ecosystem

Because the pull comes from end-users with massive budgets, it is drastically altering how quantum technology is commercialized:

• A Pragmatic Shift to Hybrid/NISQ Systems: Rather than demanding perfect, distant, fault-tolerant hardware, the industrial pull is forcing quantum providers to deliver near-term value. This has led to a major focus on Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) cloud APIs that easily integrate with existing classical chemistry software packages. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
• Industrial Consolidations & Alliances: Instead of waiting for a universal quantum computer, 8 of the top 10 global biopharma companies have already initiated active quantum pilots and joint ventures. They are embedding their own computational chemists directly into pure-play quantum software and hardware pipelines to co-design “quantum-ready” infrastructure.

Chemical Industry’s Materials & Energy “Pull” for Quantum Technology

The chemical industry is actively requesting and pulling quantum computing capabilities rather than needing to be convinced of its worth. Because simulating molecules and chemical reactions is inherently a quantum mechanical problem, the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors have long recognized that classical supercomputers hit an exponential scaling wall. For this reason, industry leaders view quantum technology not as a speculative luxury, but as the ultimate “killer app” for R&D. [1, 2, 3, 4]

The pull in the chemical sector is driven by the massive financial and environmental costs of simulating complex atomic interactions. Classical computers can only approximate these interactions, leading to years of expensive trial-and-error in wet labs. Industry is demanding quantum solutions for: [1, 2]

While the sector is fully sold on the theoretical benefits, a minor “tech push” remains regarding hardware readiness, as chemical firms push quantum developers to deliver stable, error-corrected systems that can handle real-world commercial workloads. [1, 2]

The Chemical Industry is demanding quantum solutions for: [1, 2]

• Catalyst Optimization (The “FeMoco” Problem): Global agriculture relies on the Haber-Bosch process to make fertilizer, consuming roughly 1% to 2% of the world’s entire energy supply. The industry is pulling for quantum simulations that can crack the molecular mechanics of biological nitrogen fixation, which could completely reinvent fertilizer production.
• Next-Gen Battery Chemistry: Automotive and aerospace giants are hit by a bottleneck in developing solid-state electrolytes and higher-density electrodes. They are actively seeking quantum workflows to bypass classical limitations and model new materials directly. [1]
• Carbon Capture: There is intense corporate and regulatory pull for entirely new, highly efficient materials designed at the molecular level to capture and store carbon emissions. [1]

Current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers can only simulate small molecules that classical computers can already manage. Chemical firms are aggressively building internal quantum software teams and joining cloud-based Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) networks so that the moment the hardware achieves fault tolerance, they can immediately depoy their proprietary algorithms. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Why the Chemical Industry is Pulling Quantum Tech

• Natural Alignment: Chemical engineers already rely heavily on computational tools like Density Functional Theory (DFT). They intimately understand the limitations of classical approximations and are eagerly demanding quantum processors to simulate exact electron behaviors. [1, 2]
• Lower Hardware Threshold: Unlike other industries that require millions of qubits for financial or logistical optimization, chemistry can achieve quantum advantage with much smaller, noise-managed, or early fault-tolerant systems (roughly 1,000 logical qubits). This makes the chemical sector the most immediate commercial target. [1, 2]
• Massive Economic ROI: Transitioning from physical, trial-and-error “wet labs” to hyper-accurate in silico (wholly simulated) R&D can compress product development cycles from decades to months, unlocking an estimated $200 billion to $500 billion in value by 2035. [1, 2]

High-Profile Corporate Pull (Active Collaborations) in Quantum Chemistry

The industry’s active demand is proven by the deep partnerships and joint ventures established by global chemical and energy conglomerates:

Life Science “Pull” for Quantum Technology

The life science sector wants quantum capabilities today because the financial payoff for discovering a single blockbuster drug faster is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. They do not need to be convinced of the value; they are simply waiting but actively funding—the physical scaling of the hardware to handle their massive data sets. [1, 2, 3, 4], The life sciences and pharmaceutical industry has moved well past the phase of needing to be convinced of its quantum technology’s theoretical benefits. [1, 2]

Rather than a “push” where quantum vendors are desperately trying to sell unproven tech, the current dynamic is a strategic “pull” from life science majors. Forward-looking companies are actively seeking quantum solutions to solve the “R&D paradox”—the fact that developing new products (like small-molecule drugs and biologics) has become increasingly expensive, lengthy, and prone to high failure rates. [1, 2, 3] However, the nature of this request is highly nuanced, striking a balance between intense collaboration and practical realism.

• Corporate Alliances: Companies like AstraZeneca, Amgen, and Boehringer Ingelheim have established dedicated quantum research units or consortiums. [1, 2, 3]
• Joint Ventures: Moderna and IBM are actively collaborating to apply quantum computing to mRNA sequence optimization. Similarly, Boehringer Ingelheim partnered with Google Quantum AI to map molecular dynamics. [1, 2, 3, 4]
• Consortiums & Industry Groups: Organizations like the Pistoia Alliance and QuPharm (a coalition of top pharma companies) exist specifically to aggregate pharma’s demands and dictate to quantum hardware manufacturers exactly what capabilities they need. [1]

Active “Pull”: Pharma Already at the Table

Life science giants aren’t waiting for fully mature quantum computers; they are funding active co-development partnerships. [1, 2]

• Corporate Alliances: Companies like AstraZeneca, Amgen, and Boehringer Ingelheim have established dedicated quantum research units or consortiums. [1, 2, 3]
• Joint Ventures: Moderna and IBM are actively collaborating to apply quantum computing to mRNA sequence optimization. Similarly, Boehringer Ingelheim partnered with Google Quantum AI to map molecular dynamics. [1, 2, 3, 4]
• Consortiums & Industry Groups: Organizations like the Pistoia Alliance and QuPharm (a coalition of top pharma companies) exist specifically to aggregate pharma’s demands and dictate to quantum hardware manufacturers exactly what capabilities they need. [1]

What the Life Science Sector is Specifically Requesting

The industry is focused heavily on simulation and optimization. Classical computers struggle exponentially when trying to simulate quantum mechanics—which is exactly how atoms and molecules interact in real life. Life sciences are requesting capabilities in: [1, 2, 3, 4]

• In Silico Molecular Simulation: Predicting how a drug candidate binds to a target protein, calculating exact binding affinities, and evaluating toxicity without relying purely on slow, expensive wet-lab testing. [1, 2]
• Hybrid Quantum-AI Workflows: Combining generative AI with quantum mechanics to dramatically widen the chemical space searched for new therapies. [1, 2, 3]
• Crypto-Agility & Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC): Securing highly sensitive clinical trial and patient genomic data against future quantum decryption threats. [1, 2, 3]

• The Catch: Disciplined Realism vs. Hype

While the industry wants quantum power, it does not need to be sold on marketing hype. In fact, life science leaders are highly disciplined and acutely aware of current hardware limitations. [1, 2]

• The Hardware Bottleneck: Current NISQ (Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum) and early fault-tolerant systems are still too limited to model massive biological systems entirely. For example, modeling a single complex enzyme configuration can require millions of physical qubits—a scale the industry is still working toward. [1, 2]
• Demand for Benchmarks: Rather than abstract “quantum supremacy,” life science companies are demanding “quantum advantage”—tangible proofs where a hybrid quantum-classical setup can solve a specific problem (like a specific protein folding or a complex logistics route) faster or cheaper than a supercomputer. [1, 2]